What to Think of a Registry for Murderers

Andrea's Law Murder RegistryWhen one of the nation's most liberal states takes on something like a murder registry, it's worthy of attention and piece of cake to imagine a growing tendency. The Illinois senate recently approved legislation aimed toward creating a registry for individuals released from prison after they've served a sentence for murder. "Andrea'due south Law" — named afterward Andrea Will, who was murdered past a fellow educatee while studying at Eastern Illinois Academy in 1998 — would combine a new registry for convicted first-degree murderers with an existing Illinois child murderer's registry.

Will'southward murderer, Justin Boulay, was released from prison afterward serving half his term and moved to Hawaii, which prompted an outcry that led to the new legislation. Parents of the victim felt that notification would be important. Similar to the sex activity offender registry, convicted first-caste murderers would be required to appear on a murder registry for ten years subsequently they go out of prison house.

Is the Murder Registry Just Some other Way to Make Us Experience Better?

On one manus information technology all seems to make sense. From a denizen's standpoint, we all check the sex offender registry map to see where the offenders are living in our community and the power to exercise that with a released convicted murderer has some appeal. On the other manus, it seems like a sort of double jeopardy that will make information technology nearly impossible for someone who has paid the penalty to ever get back into society.

And if it'southward to serve its intended purpose, why would information technology be limited to just showtime degree murder? How most second degree murder (which is often first degree murder that has been negotiated down)? How about drug offenses where someone sells narcotics to a child? How near all the other ways in which people finish up wrongly dead? Where does it stop? What's enough?

If y'all can accept the logic that we need to do this in the interest of public safety so nosotros're going to do information technology now – what do you do about the person who got out of jail 9 years ago? What about the argument that you committed a crime, fulfilled your sentence, and are now trying to lead a productive and normal life?

Could this be only another list that makes people experience better without any existent benefit? If you expect at the Sex Offender Registry, written report after study has shown information technology'southward done piffling more than make people experience proficient. And from an employment screening perspective, a good background screening business firm volition easily find murder information with a reasonable groundwork check. So we don't meet the listing being necessary from that standpoint. Not to mention, having access to the registry could easily get companies into trouble when it comes to accessing the list without full information needed to judge the results according to EEOC and fair hiring guidelines.

Truthfully, as a background screening company we are just unsure about this one. We are very interested in your opinion as we seek clarification regarding our stance on this.

What'south your opinion? Nosotros welcome your comments and feedback.